The Maryland General Assembly concluded its 90-day legislative session on Monday, April 13. This was an incredibly successful year for the Maryland Municipal League (MML) including passing a priority bill for the third time in the past four years! Below is a recap of a handful of impactful bills. For a more in-depth summary, please see the article soon to be published in the Local and sign up for the Legislative Session Wrap Up webinar scheduled for April 28 from noon - 1:00 pm (Link to register).
MML Priority Bill
HB 1142 – Task Force to Modernize County and Municipal Revenue Structures (Passed)
This MML priority legislation establishes a task force to study and evaluate the existing revenue structures of Maryland’s local governments. Recognizing the ongoing over-dependence on property taxes, the League led the charge to establish this body to modernize the "fiscal toolbox" for municipalities. The task force will explore new revenue options used in other states and assess their impact on local affordability, with a final report of recommendations to modernize local revenue sources due by the end of 2026.
Housing
This Administration bill aimed to address housing supply and affordability by encouraging the development of smaller “starter” and “silver” homes through changes to state and local land use policies. MML supported the goal of expanding housing options but initially opposed the bill due to concerns regarding the extent of State preemption and the potential impact on local planning and zoning authority. As the bill evolved, MML shifted to a Favorable with Amendments position and worked with stakeholders to propose substantive changes to improve the bill for municipalities.
The legislation generated significant discussion and a large number of proposed amendments throughout the session. Despite ongoing stakeholder engagement, consensus was not reached, and neither version advanced prior to crossover. While the bill did not pass this year, it reflects continued legislative interest in statewide housing policy and is likely to remain part of the conversation in future sessions.
Personnel
HB 831 / SB 922 - Collective Bargaining - Local Government Employees and Public Employee Relations Act (Did Not Pass)
Sixteen municipal governments currently allow a category or certain set of categories of employees (police, fire, public works, etc.) to join a union and collectively bargain for specific compensation and benefits. However, all the discretion resides with the employer to dictate the type or types of employees that may collectively bargain, the types of wages and benefits that can be negotiated, and whether there is binding arbitration. Of those 16 municipalities, most limit which employees can collectively bargain and do not allow for binding arbitration.
These bills would broadly allow all local government employees to organize and collectively bargain. If implemented, these bills would lead to an increase in the number of municipal employees that collectively bargain in those municipalities that currently allow it and would increase the number of municipalities that have employees that collectively bargain. MML opposed this legislation on several grounds, primarily that additional sets of employees that collectively bargain will lead to increased costs and administrative burden.
Environment
HB 34 / SB 189 - Municipalities - Open Drainage Inlets - Inventory and Improvements (Mason's Law) (Passed)
Data Privacy
SB 632 - State Government - State Elected Officials - Protection of Personal Information (Did Not Pass)
As introduced, this bill looked to establish an Office of State Elected Officials Information Privacy in the Department of Legislation Affairs as well as a process for removing elected officials’ personal information from public platforms. The policy was part of a broader effort to reduce security risks tied to publicly accessible data, particularly considering the killing of former Speaker of the Minnesota House Melissa Hortman and her husband, which highlighted the vulnerability of elected officials. While the Maryland Municipal League supported the intent of the bill, concerns were raised about implementation with the bill increasing municipal workloads due to a short 72-hour window for redacting or shielding records. The bill also increased administrative workload, possibly straining municipal capacity.
The bill also introduced potential legal and fiscal exposure for government entities by allowing penalties such as injunctive relief and attorney fees for noncompliance. To address this, the League introduced a “good faith” amendment that would protect governmental entities who make reasonable efforts to comply but fall short due to technical or timing challenges. This amendment would balance the bill's public safety objective while still addressing the operational realities facing local governments. SB 632 passed out of the Senate but did not achieve final passage in the House committee.


